Is Humanitarian Military Intervention ( Hmi ) Legitimate

Is Humanitarian Military Intervention (HMI) Legitimate? Humanitarian Military Intervention in the recent years has been creating a lot of controversies and debates all over the world. It has become one of the most debated concepts in the field of international relations. To be able to justify the so-called HMIs is a highly problematic issue at hand. Before we go any further into the debate of HMI, let us first try and understand what the concept actually means. One very interesting and exhaustive view (in my personal regard) about the concept of HMI that I came across is found in the book ‘Encyclopedia of Global Justice’. â€Å"Humanitarian Military Intervention is the violation of the strict sovereignty of a state, defined as humanitarian by its aim of remedying or preventing human rights violations. The humanitarian aim is necessary for distinguishing the intervention from other various acts of military aggression that are strictly prohibited by international law and convention. Humanitarian military intervention is often understood to constitute a noteworthy application of Just War Theory, and, on many accounts represents an exception to the prohibition on the use of military force in international relations. Within the Just War tradition, humanitarian intervention is distinguished from wars of conquest by its humanitarian aims, and from humanitarian assistance by virtue of forcefully violating state sovereignty.† This definition, in my view, demonstrates the complexity of

The Monarchy And A Dictatorship Essay - 1221 Words

Constitutional Beginnings Assignment Constitutional Beginnings: Describe some of the purposes of â€Å"government†. The government has multiple purposes. Some purposes of the government are to protect the Unites States from outside attacks, such as terrorists, and from itself, provide citizens with civil rights, promote general welfare and establish justice. What are some of the differences between a monarchy and a dictatorship? A monarchy and a dictatorship are forms of government that are similar but also extremely different. Some of the differences between a monarchy and a dictatorship are how the person comes into rule. In a monarchy, there are no elections to see who becomes the next ruler, the crown gets passed down to the next generation in the royal family when the original monarch dies. A dictatorship is ruled by a person who usurped power and stayed that way by altering the rules, they are very powerful and get to where they are by brute force. Compare/contrast a direct democracy with an indirect democracy. A direct democracy is a form of democracy where all people decide directly on policy initiatives. An indirect democracy is a form of governance in which the citizens rule through representatives, who are periodically elected in order to keep them accountable. (pg.48) This shows that there are differences in terms of population representation. Direct democracy and indirect democracy both recognize the people as the supreme authority. Theories of Democracy:Show MoreRelatedGovernment, Democracy, Monarchy, Dictatorship, And Democracy1526 Words   |  7 Pagesa handful of roles, at least not as much as they have today. Today the United States government gives pensions, healthcare insurance like Medicare and Medicaid, Social security benefits etc. There are many types of governments- Democracy, Monarchy, Dictatorship etc. DEMOCRACY The origin of the word â€Å"Democracy† is Greek. It’s derived from the words ‘Demos’ meaning People and the word ‘Kratus’ meaning power. So basically, Democracy means power to the people. The ‘people’ in this case decide who willRead MoreEssay about What is Politics?1184 Words   |  5 Pagesgovernment and how they evolved. Two types of governments exist. A government can either be classified as a monarchy or a republic. To be classified as a monarchy, a government must have some kind of royal family that inherits their position of power. Different types of monarchs exist. A monarchy may be a limited monarchy, a constitutional monarchy, or an absolute monarchy. A limited monarchy is one in which the royalty have only ceremonial powers. An example of this is in the United Kingdom. WhileRead MoreCompare and Contrast the Different Systems of Government755 Words   |  3 PagesThroughout history, there have been many systems of government that have been created, and have revolutionised todays modern forms of government. Democracy, Monarchy, Dictatorship, Theocracy, and Anarchy all use various, unique techniques on how to run a civilization. Each of them require different leadership traits in order for it to work properly. There are numerous examples of significant people who have demonstrated a form of governments necessary leadership traits, such as the Dalai Lama, aRead MoreThe New Zealand Government647 Words   |  3 Pages(MMP) and Single Transferable Vote (STV), are used to allow electors to select representatives to sit on Councils, Boards and in Parliament. Some elements of Constitutional Monarchy are present in the New Zealand system of democratically elected representatives within a constitutional Monarchy contrasts well with the dictatorship of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. Central Government in New Zealand is based on the democratic system with Political Parties voted into Parliament based on the will of the peopleRead MoreForms Of Government And Its Effect On National Identity980 Words   |  4 PagesASSIGNMENT 1: FORMS OF GOVERNMENT Each country has its own unique form of government that helps shape its national identity but experts identify at least nine forms of governments. These are Communism, Marxism, Socialism, Monarchy, Republic, Dictatorship, Totalitarianism, Anarchy and Tyranny. All the other types are just modifications and improvements of these nine so that they can be suitable for that particular country. Communism, according to Remy Melina, is that form of government where in theRead MoreEssay on Government923 Words   |  4 Pagesfalls into two categories; monarchy or a republic. A monarchy is a form of government that is always headed by a monarch (king, queen, emperor, etc.) These monarchs develop this status most often by heredity. Monarchies are divided into three different magnitudes; limited, constitutional, and absolute. A limited monarchy is where the sovereigns powers are limited to ceremonial events. They do not interfere with politics. Most countries that have a limited monarchy have a Prime Minister thatRead More Napoleon Betrayed the Revolution Essay1320 Words   |  6 Pagesfraternity. However if Napoleon did not betray the revolution, he consolidated the revolutionary ideals. The only way of determining whether Napoleon consolidated or betrayed the revolution is to explore his actions such as his military success, Dictatorship and social reforms. The difficulty of this analysis is that Napoleons motives for his actions determine whether he consolidated or betrayed the Revolution. If Napoleon betrayed the revolution, then he betrayed the ideals of Liberty, equalityRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1710 Words   |  7 Pagesprince of hemophilia since they feared it was not right for a peasant to be a trusted friend and very close to the royal family in their society at the time. Propaganda helped increase the support necessary for the Bolsheviks to overthrow the Russian monarchy and eventually assassinating the Romanovs in Yekaterinburg, Russia on July 17,1918. Soviet propaganda was fabricated and biased in most cases. For example, when the Soviets tried to criticize the United States for trying to make a computer, theyRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1510 Words   |  7 Pagesto numerous inner and outer conflicts of each character. However, as it is brought into being a character, Edgar in the end of the story, it implies new beginning of the kingdom. In addition, as comparing king Lear with Edgar, two social systems, monarchy and democracy can be evaluated. Democracy pursues freedom with less government intervention. This promotes each individual to take his/her own responsibility and protects the interest of citizenship. It also has stability in administration asRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke928 Words   |  4 Pagesreasons for disturbances in nature. According to Hobbes in order to maintain peace and safety there must be a powerful central government. Either a man or an assembly of men would have absolute power over every individual. He believed in a monarchy, such as dictatorship. He believed in Commonwealth, which is a single person who withholds all the sovereign power and he may use this strength to generate a society with peace and safety. My perspective on Hobbes political view is that I agree with how he

Daoism, Confucianism, Legalism free essay sample

Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism are all forms of different ways of thinking. These different â€Å"thought processes† are considered, in different ways, a big influence on different cultures. The differences in all of these philosophies is what makes them unique, they are, in my opinion, way beyond their own time period. Many people think of these as mostly religion or philosophy, but either may be true. This essay will present the facts associated with each of these ways of thinking. Confucianism was founded around the fifth or sixth century BC, and it is still surviving with around five to six million followers. Confucianism was not exactly founded by Confucius himself, but he was more of a transmitter to teach other people about this way of life. It greatly impacted the way of life and culture in China, even today it still affects the Asian countries such as Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. The main belief in Confucianism is to achieve benevolence, as it signifies excellent character and virtues. We will write a custom essay sample on Daoism, Confucianism, Legalism or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Daoism was founded by Lao Zi, and not much is known about him due to many stories of him are thought to be legends and cannot be confirmed. The teaching is about an energy that was given off by all living things. This energy was called â€Å"Dao†. Daoism teaches to forget all worldly possessions and wants and attempt to commune with nature. It basically teaches how people to treat nature and the natural world, as well as themselves personally. Legalism was a way to make all citizens of China model citizens to act as the dynasty at that time wanted them to. They made laws very harsh therefore nobody would be brave enough to break any. It gives the people almost no civil rights or personal freedoms outside of the laws they must abide by. The legalists believed in the well-being of the state or region, not an individual person. Legalism was also founded in about 770-221 BC, and the founder was Hsun Tzu. As you can clearly see, these three philosophies molded and shaped Chinese culture and thoughts throughout the early years of its civilization. It still affects the culture today, as many Chinese people still follow these teachings. They all were founded around the same time period and therefore many people of that time probably followed all three philosophies to keep a simple and good life. These three teachings have all survived today, and still have many followers. Without these teachings, there would be a very small cultural difference in the Chinese people.